• Printed Journal
  • Indexed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal
Journal of Applied Science & Engineering

Dhaka University Journal of Applied Science & Engineering

Issue: Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2021
Title: An Efficient Handover Mechanism for SDN-Based 5G HetNets
  • Shaikhum Monira
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Upama Kabir
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Mosarrat Jahan
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Uchswas Paul
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Information Technology and Sciences, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Keywords: SDN, 5G, HetNet, Handover, Mobile Communication

Handover is crucial for data portability, real-time data generation, and data processing in mobile technology. Up to 4G, handover efficiency reached optimal stability. However, with the entrance of 5G, the cellular network has turned into a complete heterogeneous network (HetNet) with enormous diversity due to the integration of Internet of Things (IoT) devices with mobile networks. Resource-constrained IoT devices differ notably in operational features from traditional mobile devices. Those devices usually need a smaller geographical cell with better connectivity coverage than conventional large cells of the same size. Hence, to support IoT, 5G splits large geographical cell areas into small cells and allows bandwidth sharing during Device-to-Device (D2D) communication. In a nutshell, 5G infrastructures and architectures have been changed a lot from the previous generations, and handover needs to be re-thought for efficient mobility management. This paper has incorporated the concept of Software-defined Network (SDN) in a 5G cellular network to simplify HetNet and provide efficient handover management within it. We illustrate our proposed handover management concept within this simplified HetNet that utilizes idle time scanning and preauthentication to reduce handover delay. The experimental implementation shows a significant 42% delay optimization during inter-domain reactive handover with 50% less communication overhead than the existing scheme.

  1. M. Stočes, J. Vaněk, J. Masner, and J. Pavlík, “Internet of things (IoT) in agriculture-selected aspects,” Agris on-line Papers in Econ. Inform., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 2016
  2. F. K. Santoso and N. C. Vun, “Securing IoT for smart home system,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Consum. Electron. (ISCE), pp. 1–2, 2015.
  3. J.-i. Jeong, “A study on the IoT based smart door lock system,” in Inf. Sci. Appl. (ICISA), Springer, pp. 1307– 1318, 2016.
  4. A. Ali, “IoT based disaster detection and early warning device,” Int. J. MC Square Scientific Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 20–25, 2017.
  5. J. Pilz, M. Mehlhose, T. Wirth, D. Wieruch, B. Holfeld, and T. Haustein, “A tactile internet demonstration: 1ms ultra low delay for wireless communications towards 5G,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Commun. Workshops (INFOCOMWKSHPS), pp. 862–863, 2016.
  6. S. Nastic, S. Sehic, D.-H. Le, H.-L. Truong, and S. Dustdar, “Provisioning software-defined IoT cloud systems,” in Proc. IEEE int. conf. future internet of things and cloud, pp. 288–295, 2014.
  7. T. Ma, F. Hu, and M. Ma, “Fast and efficient physical layer authentication for 5GHetNet handover,” in Proc. IEEE 27th Int. Conf. Telecommun. Netw. Appl. (ITNAC), pp. 1–3, 2017.
  8. R. Dautov and H. Song, “Towards IoT diversity via automated fleet management.” in MDE4IoT/ModComp@ MoDELS, pp. 47–54, 2019.
  9. S, Sönmez, I. Shayea, S. A. Khan, and A. Alhammadi, “Handover management for next-generation wireless networks: A brief overview,” in Proc. IEEE Microwave Theory Techn. Wireless Commun. (MTTW), vol. 1, pp. 35–40, 2020
  10. R. I. Ansari, C. Chrysostomou, S. A. Hassan, M. Guizani, S. Mumtaz, J. Rodriguez, and J. J. Rodrigues, “5GD2D networks: Techniques, challenges, and future prospects,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 3970–3984, 2017.
  11. M. H. Adnan and Z. Ahmad Zukarnain, “Device-to-device communication in 5G environment: Issues, solutions, and challenges,” Symmetry, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1762, 2020
  12. Y. Bi, G. Han, C. Lin, M. Guizani, and X. Wang, “Mobilitymanagement for intro/inter domain handover in software defined networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1739–1754, 2019.
  13. A. Ozhelvaci and M. Ma, “Secure and efficient vertical handover authentication for 5GHetNets,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Signal Process(ICICSP), pp. 27–32, 2018.
  14. X. Duan and X. Wang, “Authentication handover and privacy protection in 5GHetNets using software-defined networking,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 28–35, 2015.
  15. V. Yajnanarayana, H. Rydén, and L. Hévizi, “5G handover using reinforcement learning,” in Proc. IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF), pp. 349–354, 2020.
  16. J. Prados-Garzon, O. Adamuz-Hinojosa, P. Ameigeiras, J. J. Ramos-Munoz, P. Andres-Maldonado, and J. M. Lopez-Soler, “Handover implementation in a 5GSDN-based mobile network architecture,” in Proc. IEEE 27th Annu. Int. Symp. Pers. Indoor Mobile Radio Commun. (PIMRC), pp. 1–6, 2016.
  17. T. S. Rappaport, Wireless communications: principles and practice. Vol. 2, prentice hall PTR New Jersey, 1996.
  18. J. F. Kurose, Computer networking: A top-down approach featuring the internet, 3/E. Pearson Education India, 2005.
  19. A. Jain, E. Lopez-Aguilera, and I. Demirkol, “Are mobility management solutions ready for 5G and beyond?” Comput. Commun., vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 50–75, 2020.
  20. T. Bilen, B. Canberk, and K. R. Chowdhury, “Handover management in software-defined ultra-dense 5G networks,” IEEE Netw., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 49–55, 2017.
  21. S. Basloom, N. Akkari, and G. Aldabbagh, “Reducing handoff delay in SDN-based 5G networks using AP clustering,” Procedia Comp. Sci., vol. 163, pp. 198–208, 2019.
  22. D. G. Park, J. W. Oh, and J. Jeong, “SFSH: a novel smart factory SDN-layer handoff scheme in 5G-enabled mobile networks,” J. Ambient Intell. Humanized Comput., vol. 11, pp. 5913–5925, 2020.
  23. R. Duo, C. Wu, T. Yoshinaga, and Y. Ji, “SDN-based handover approach in IEEE 802.11p and LTE hybrid
  24. vehicular networks,” in Proc. IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intell. Comput., Adv. Trusted Comput., Scalable Comput. Commun., Cloud and Big Data Comput., Internet of People and Smart City Innov., pp. 1870–1875, 2018.
  25. Q. Wang, S. Zhao, and C. Hou, “UE assisted mobility management based on SDN,” in Proc. IEEE 11th Int. Conf. on Comput. Sci. & Educ. (ICCSE), pp. 689–695, 2016.
  26. J. Chen, X. Ge, and Q. Ni, “Coverage and handoff analysis of 5G fractal small cell networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1263–1276, 2019.
  27. K. Ouali, M. Kassar, T. M. T. Nguyen, K. Sethom, and B. Kervella, “An efficient D2D handover management scheme for SDN-based 5G networks,” in Proc. IEEE 17th Annu. Conf. Consum. Commun. Netw. (CCNC), pp. 1–6, 2020.
  28. S. Monira, U. Kabir, M. Jahan, and U. Paul, “An efficient and secure handover mechanism for SDN-enabled 5Ghetnet,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Black Sea Commun. Netw. (BlackSeaCom), pp. 1–6, 2021.
  29. P. Leach, M. Mealling, and R. Salz, “A universally unique identifier (uuid) URN namespace,” RFC 4122, 2005
  30. C. Zhang, X. Wang, A. Dong, Y. Zhao, Q. He, and M. Huang, “Energy efficient network service deployment across multiple SDN domains,” Comput. Commun., vol. 151, pp. 449–462, 2020.
  31. S. Goli-Bidgoli and N. Movahhedinia, “Towards ensuring reliability of vehicular ad hoc networks using a relay selection techniques and D2D communications in 5G networks,” Wireless Pers. Commun., vol. 114, pp. 2755–2767, 2020.
  32. Mininet documentation. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/mininet/mininet/wiki/Documentation
  33. POX manual current documentation. [Online]. Available: https://noxrepo.github.io/pox-doc/html.